In the Network: Media Co-opDominion   Locals: HalifaxMontrealTorontoVancouver

Support the Media Co-op
Donate today!

Useful Information

Sponsored Message:

Advertisement

My blog

Blog entries by Gwalgen Dent

posted by Gwalgen Dent
Occupy Wall Street: The Corporate Canadian Connection

With Occupy Wall Street protesters looking like they will stand to live another day, focus has begun to shift on the company that recently tried to evict them: Brookfield Properties.

Brookfiled is actually a subsidiary (technically it is 50% owned) by Brookefield Asset Managment, a company that is headquartered in Brookfield Place in downtown Toronto.  The Media Co-op Investor Series has previously featured Brookfield.

Brookfield owns Zucotti Park, where Occupy Wall Street protesters had set up shop and have been camping for the past few months.  However this week, Brookfield threatened to evict the protesters.

According to the CBC New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg said the eviction was postponed after Brookfield received threatening calls from New York elected public officials, although no one has confirmed who they might be.

The New York City branch of the National Lawyers Guild also wrote a letter to Brookfield saying the eviction would violate the "constitutional rights" of the protesters. "There is no basis in the law for your request for police intervention, nor have you cited any," they wrote. "Such police action without a prior court order would be unconstitutional and unlawful."

The irony is that Brookfield could have the same problem in Canada.  In addition to owning Zucotti Park, site of New York Protests, Brookfield also owns the massive 242,000 square metres Brookfield Place, right in the heart of Bay street Toronto.  Though it has not been stated where the Occupy Toronto protests will take place, they could, hypothetically, target Brookfield property given its size.

Brookfield Asset Management' board is loaded with political bigwigs including:

-Frank McKenna, former Premier of New Brunswick, Canadian Ambassador to the US and touted Federal Liberal leadership 

-Jim Pattison, the 4th richest Canadian and onwner of the Jim Pattison Group, the third largest private company in Canada 

-Jack Mintz, an economist who has been frequently quoted in the press over the past few years as the go-to guy for Canadian economic and tax policy.  He is in favour of the HST and the constant lowering of corporate taxes

In a twist showing the embedded connections between rich companies like Brookfield and politicians, the subsidiary,...

posted by Gwalgen Dent

In a classic-case of just desserts, Kevin O'Leary has been chastized by the CBC's Ombudsman for his comments towards Chris Hedges in a recent interview on CBC's Lang-O'Leary Exchange.

Rabble has the story including a quote from the Ombudsman's report:

There is room at the inn for a range of views, but there is no room for name-calling a guest. At the very least, suggesting Hedges was a "nutbar" undermined what was likely a more interesting discussion. At worst, it permitted The Lang & O'Leary Exchange to be criticized as no different than the all-heat, no-light discussion shows that diminish discourse, far from the ambitions of a flagship business program on a public broadcaster. O'Leary might have been genuinely curious about Hedges' views, but his opening salvo only fed contempt, which breached policy. When O'Leary asked Hedges "don't take this the wrong way," it came across as disingenuous and begged the question: Is there a "right way" to take being called a nutbar?

Correctly and quickly, CBC News concluded it was unacceptable for O'Leary to do what he did. Its private apology to Hedges was a responsible gesture, as was its discussion with O'Leary about the inappropriateness of the name-calling. What was unclear was why the program would stop there and not acknowledge this also to the audience. Only the guest received the benefit of the private apology, from the programmer and not the principal himself. When CBC News acknowledges error, I believe that closure is better achieved and accountability better demonstrated by communicating that to the audience and not simply to the correspondents. In this instance it would help fulfill the spirit of CBC Journalistic Standards and Practices, a substantial policy which in principle embraces the public element of its implementation.

This is the second time this year O'Leary has been criticized by the CBC's Ombudsman.  In March, he was found to have made...

posted by Gwalgen Dent

Recently the Toronto Media Co-op took a look at the winners and losers in the stampede for Libya's oil resources.

Today, the Toronto Star outlined the Canadian companies entering the fray:

“As I’m sure you would expect, we’re watching the situation extremely carefully and waiting to see how it all unfolds,” said Kelli Stevens, a spokesperson with Calgary-based Suncor.

“The biggest thing is that if we were to go back we would want to do so safely, responsibly, in compliance with sanctions.”

The energy firm, working in partnership with the state-owned National Oil Corporation, was producing about 50,000 barrels of oil a day before the uprising.

A spokesperson for Montreal’s SNC Lavalin, which was working on an irrigation project and building a prison and airport when the uprising began, said they’re still monitoring the situation in Libya.

“For the moment, our position is unchanged. Our projects are still on hold, and we intend to return to Libya once the situation is resolved and diplomatic relations are re-established,” said Leslie Quinton.

Both Suncor and SNC-Lavalin have been featured in the Media Co-op Investor series.

posted by Gwalgen Dent

Nouriel Roubini, one of the world's most well-known economists, discusses his take on the current market climate in the Wall Street Journal. 

Money quote:

"Karl Marx said it right, at some point capitalism can destroy itself because you cannot keep shifting income from labour to capital without not having an excess capacity and lack of aggregate demand and that's what's happening.  We thought that markets work; they're not working...it's a self destructive process."

 

 

posted by Gwalgen Dent

Last month, a white, far-right, Christian fundamentalist in Olso, Norway orchestrated a terror-attack which bombed downtown Olso and killed between 60-70 people and injured close to 100 others on at a Labour-party youth camp near the Norwegian capital.

Friends of the Media Co-op in Norway have offered the following thoughts on the attacks:

 
"I haven't done anything except reading and watching the news since Friday. It has been terrible days for Norway, and obviously many of us knew people who got killed or who had friends that was killed. I am doing ok, as is my closest friends and family. However, I just found out yesterday that I knew one of the girls that was killed in the bombing of Oslo centre, so it is quite hard to go to work today. The way Norway has reacted to the tragedy helps us cope with the meaningless violence. It was beautiful to see more than 200 000 people stand united outside the Oslo city hall on Monday and to see the vast ocean of flowers outside the cathedral."
 
Bjoern
 
------
 
"We are all affected in some way or another. Small country... Needless to say we are all shocked and disgusted to our deepest guts. But we aren't going to be all hysterical like Fox News about it. Instead we'll counter it with showing each other love and respect. 
 

"Names of the deceased are being announced little by little. First five or six yesterday. The rest in the following days."

Geir

------

"Norway is now slowly coming back to its normal state, and newspapers are beginning to get filled with the normal gossip again.(and some newspapers are even starting to report from the killings in syria!)

I am very happy that the killer was a blond Norwegian and not a Muslim. By the way  this totally surprised the secret police, they havent monitored racists since a Norwegian killed an adopted child in 2001. At that time the police knew about the killing almost before it was committed, but this year they were searching for the muslims while the killer drove towards the island where he continued his crime.

Now the anti-immigrant forces are on the defensive, it is difficult for them to speak in public about their beliefs, and it will be very interesting to see how the political debate will be in the time to come....

posted by Gwalgen Dent
AMC journalists and TCMN members

Don't let Christie Blatchford fool you.

Blatchford, the Globe and Mail columnist who's being protested amid accusations of being racist towards 6-Nations, also declared after the G20 that several journalists covering the summit who were threatened with rape, severely assaulted and subject to homophobic slurs by police, weren't actually journalists

The fact that disqualified them from the title of 'journalist' was of course that they were journalists with the Alternative Media Centre (AMC), some of whom were also members of the Toronto Media Co-op.

Writing in her Globe and Mail column, Blatchford has this obviously-fact-checked gem to illuminate her readers with:  "Of course, let us not pretend that these folks are working journalists or that they are the equivalent. They aren't, for the most part."

Sadly for her, facts aren't the only thing going against Ms. Blatchford these days.

It seems prominent Ontarian journalist Steve Paikin also disagrees.

Today, Paikin, who hosts TVOntario's (TVO) the Agenda with Steve Paikin, testified at a parliamentary committee that he saw Altenative Media Centre journalist Jesse Rosenfeld being assaulted by police.  An article in the Toronto Star quotes Paikin as saying:

"I did see the police assault a journalist. They took his accreditation because they wanted to check out whether he was who he said he was. Two police officers held him, He was chippy, he didn’t swear but he was talking a lot. He was saying ‘Why are you holding me. There is no need to hold me. I am who I say I am’.

“One officer held one arm, The other officer held the other arm and a third officer came up to him and basically told him to shut up three times, punched him in the stomach. He doubled over. The same officer brought his elbow down on the small of his back and...

posted by Gwalgen Dent

With the speed and degree of attack breathtaking but anticipated, Julian Assange has officially pissed off almost ever government in the world and is now being targetted financially, criminally and physically.

Numerous different articles in the Guardian and CBC have outlined the fight both Wikileaks and Assange are facing.

On the financial attacks:

The international pressure on Julian Assange increased today after the banking arm of the Swiss post office [PostFinance] announced that it had closed the WikiLeaks founder's account because he had given "false information".

PostFinance is the latest institution to sever its ties with Assange and WikiLeaks. Last week, Amazon.com withdrew its hosting of WikiLeaks' cables site and the WikiLeaks.org domain was taken offline by Everydns.net. On Saturday, PayPal, which is owned by the auction website eBay, froze WikiLeaks' account, saying it was being used for "illegal" activity. - Guardian

None of these companies took action against Wikileaks with the posting of the Afghan and Iraqi warlogs.

On criminal attacks:

[Wikileaks lawyers] Jennifer Robinson and Mark Stephens of the law firm Finers Stephens Innocent told the Guardian they had been watched by people parked outside their houses for the past week.

"I've noticed people consistently sitting outside my house in the same cars with newspapers," said Robinson. "I probably noticed certain things a week ago, but mostly it's been the last three or four days."

Stephens told BBC1's Andrew Marr Show: "It is quite bizarre, because the chief prosecutor in Sweden dropped the entire case against him, saying there was absolutely nothing for him to find back in September, and then a few weeks later on – after the intervention of a Swedish politician – a new prosecutor, not in Stockholm where Julian and these women had been, but in Gothenburg, began a new case which has resulted in these warrants and the Interpol Red Notice being put out." - Guardian

On death threats:

Former U.S. Republican vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin, who is widely expected to run for president in 2012, has called the former computer hacker an "anti-American operative with blood on his hands" and accused Obama of...

posted by Gwalgen Dent

Suprise, suprise!

In a shocking  announcement , it seems G20 police will not be charged for using excessive force with civilians.  According to the CBC:

The province's Special Investigations Unit (SIU), which probes incidents where civilians are hurt or killed in an interaction with police officers, said Thursday that it is probable excessive force was used in the case of two men who suffered facial fractures at a June 26 protest at Queen's Park."
 
Toronto Police have apparently had investigatiors working round the clock, pouring over thousands of hours of video tape to find the most minute details of black block protesters in the hopes of identifying and charging them.  However, they for some reason have been unable to use the same tools to identify the Police who committed crimes on that day.

The arrest is also captured in a YouTube video. But Scott said "it is impossible from the video to identify the officer who delivered these blows. They are all wearing largely identical clothing with helmets, and the video is taken from too great a distance to be of any assistance."

As the SIU was unable to determine exactly which officer used excessive force, it is not proceeding with a criminal investigation.

The investigation was done by the SIU, a civilian oversight board.  Shortly after its current director Ian D. Scott was appointed to head the Unit in 2008, Ontarian Ombudsman Andre Marin issued a timely review in which he stated that the SIU was toothless, suffering from a "faulty infrastructure" and a lack of resources.

""There's no doubt in my mind that an SIU investigation is one which is currently done through blue-coloured glasses. There's no doubt that there's a police bias in their approach to investigations," he said.

According to the Globe and Mail who covered the review:

His report follows an investigation launched by his office in June, 2007, amid complaints that the SIU has a pro-police bias. He found plenty of evidence to back up those complaints. These include delays and lack of vigour in investigations, a reluctance to insist on the co-operation of police, and a culture overly influenced by former police officers - all of its investigative managers are retired police...

posted by Gwalgen Dent

From a CBC review of the new the Omar Khadr documentary, You Don't Like the Truth: 4 Days Inside Guantanamo:

"Even Damien Corsetti, who was a U.S. interrogator at Bagram prison – where Khadr was detained before going to Guantánamo – is dismayed at his treatment. Corsetti, who describes himself as a monster in the interrogation room, went easy on the young man: "When I saw him at Bagram, he was a typical 15-year-old kid. He was still a child. That was what was prevalent in him, the child,” Corsetti says in the doc.

"Canadian people need to look at themselves and figure out who they are," Corsetti later claims. "There have been elections since Omar was captured, so now ultimately the blame lies on the Canadian people. Why is it that I, as a cold, callous son-of-a-bitch, had more compassion for that boy than his own people?"

posted by Gwalgen Dent

The Globe had an amazing article on how businesses teamed up with the media in the 90's to do everything in their power to undermine the Provincial NDP government at the day. 

For those of you whom have seen the British TV series A Very British Coup it reads almost like it's from a playbook.

Choice quotes:

"The attacks came from all sides. It is no exaggeration to say hysterical fear-mongering and sabotage was the order of the day. Launched within the very first year of the new government, the attackers included every manner of business big and small, both Canadian and American-owned, almost all private media, the police (especially in Toronto), landlords and lobbying/government relations firms. Their goal was clear, and they had the money and power to achieve it.

"After the new finance minister's very first meeting with the banking community , a bank vice-president told him, in the presence of an aide: “Nice speech, Mr. Minister, but we're going to kill you.” And they did.

"Of course hostile editorials were fully expected. Less predictable were the full-page statements in the press denouncing the labor amendments. Even more unprecedented was the delegation consisting of the publishers of all three dailies who appeared in the premier's office to express their hostility in person."

 

User login

Advertisement